Complaints may concern editorial conduct, peer-review procedures, publication ethics, conflicts of interest, corrections, authorship disputes, published material, or other aspects of journal management.
Complaints should clearly identify the article or submission involved, describe the concern, and provide relevant supporting information where available.
Authors may appeal an editorial decision when they believe that a significant factual, procedural, or academic error affected the decision. An appeal should provide a clear scholarly justification and should not merely express disagreement with reviewer comments or the editorial outcome.
The journal will assess the available documentation, editorial history, peer-review information, relevant policies, and any response from involved parties before reaching an outcome. Additional expert advice may be sought where necessary.
Good-faith complaints and appeals will be considered respectfully and should not result in retaliation. Deliberately false, abusive, threatening, or harassing communications may be handled appropriately by the journal.