Analisis Perbandingan Routing Static Dengan Penerapan IPV4 Dan IPV6 Pada SMPN 9 Kaur

  • A.R Walad Mahfuzhi Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
  • RG Guntur Alam Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
  • Agung Karisma Hidayah Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
  • Ravi Putra Lingga Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
Keywords: IPv4, IPv6, Static Routing, Quality of Service (QoS),, TIPHON, NDLC.

Abstract

With the rapid development of internet technology, the need for efficient and stable protocols is increasingly important. This study aims to compare the performance of static routing on IPv4 and IPv6 protocols at SMPN 9 Kaur, with a focus on quality of service (QoS) based on the TIPHON standard. The research method used is the Network Development Life Cycle (NDLC), including the stages of analysis, design, testing, implementation, monitoring, and management. The results show that IPv6 has better performance than IPv4. On an IPv6 network using WiFi, a packet loss of 0%, a delay of 0.43 ms, a jitter of 0.201 ms, and a throughput of 4840 kbps was obtained. Meanwhile, IPv4 based on WiFi had a packet loss of 0%, a delay of 22.1175 ms, a jitter of 7.8903 ms, and a throughput of 409 kbps. The conclusion of this study is that IPv6 is superior in terms of network stability and efficiency compared to IPv4

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Algiffary, A., & Sutabri, T. (2023). Indonesian Journal of Computer Science.Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 12(2), 284–301. http://ijcs.stmikindonesia.ac.id/ijcs/index.php/ijcs/article/view/3135
[2] Amuda, S., Mulya, M. F., & Kurniadi, F. I. (2021). Analisis dan Perancangan Simulasi Perbandingan Kinerja Jaringan Komputer Menggunakan Metode Protokol Routing Statis, Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) dan Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) (Studi Kasus Tanri Abeng University). Jurnal SISKOM-KB (Sistem Komputer dan Kecerdasan Buatan), 4(2), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.47970/siskom-kb.v4i2.189
[3] Dwiartanto, D. B., Pranindito, D., & Iryani, N. (2021). Analisa Perbandingan Performansi Jaringan IPv4 dan IPv6 pada MPLS VPN menggunakan Server IMS Core. Jurnal Telekomunikasi dan Komputer, 11(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.22441/incomtech.v11i2.10195
[4]https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=ogc58S8AAAAJ&citation_for_view=ogc58S8AAAAJ:9yKSN-GCB0IC
[5] Intan Saputri. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan IPv4 dan IPv6 pada Jaringan SMKN 7 Palopo. BANDWIDTH: Journal of Informatics and Computer Engineering, 1(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.53769/bandwidth.v1i1.382
[6] Lora, P. (2024). IMPLEMENTASI ROUTING STATIC MULTI HOP PADA. 12(3).
[7] Mualfah, D., Putra, G. M., Firdaus, R., Komputer, F. I., & Riau, U. M. (n.d.). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN IPv4 DENGAN IPv6 PENGGUNAAN CCTV BERBASIS AREA TRAFFICT CONTROL SECURITY (ATCS). 124–128.
[8] Ndclm, M. (2025). Implementasi Dan Evaluasi Perbandingan IPV4 dan IPV6.
14(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.36774/jusiti.v14i1.1542
[9] Oktaviani, Y. E., & Primawan, A. B. (n.d.). ID : 15 Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Routing Statis dan Dinamis dengan Teknik RIP Pada Topologi Ring DalamJaringan LAN Comparative Analysis of Static and Dynamic Routing Performance with RIP Techniques on Ring Topology in LAN Networks. November 2021, 120–130.
[10] Penerapan, J., Informasi, T., & Notohamidjojo, J. O. (2024). IT-EXPLORE. 03, 359–367.
[11] Rino Erik Sanrio, Primantara Hari Trisnawan, B. F. A. (2020). Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Protokol Routing Rip Dan Ospf Pada Topologi Mesh. Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 1(1), 1–8.
[12] Sandi, T. A. A., Purnama, R. A., Firmansyah, F., & Heristian, S. (2022). Komparasi Static Routing Menggunakan IPv4 Dengan IPv6 Guna Meningkatkan Quality Of Service. Computer Science (CO-SCIENCE), 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31294/coscience.v2i1.891
[13] Saputra, D., & Geni, B. Y. (2024). ANALISA DAN PERANCANGAN JARINGAN WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK ( WLAN ) DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE NDLC ( STUDI KASUS : DI TOKO BESI KUNCIRAN BAJA ). 8(2), 2382–2389.
[14] Sekolah, D. I., & Pertama, M. (2021). EduTIK: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Volume 1 Nomor 1, Februari 2021. 1.
[15] Setiawan, P. (2023). Rancang Bangun Jaringan Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) menggunakan Microtik dan Routing Statik pada MTs Al Barokah Poncowarno Lampung Tengah. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Dan Informatika- JISKA, 1(2), 85. http://jurnal.unidha.ac.id/index.php/jteksis
[16] Syarifatun, I., Miyarno, R., Fatwa, T., & Rizqi, A. (2024). Analisis Quality of Service ( QoS ) Menggunakan Standar Parameter Tiphon pada Jaringan Internet Berbasis Wi-Fi Kampus 1 Unjaya. 17(1), 1–9.
Published
2025-10-09
How to Cite
Mahfuzhi, A., Alam, R., Hidayah, A., & Lingga, R. (2025). Analisis Perbandingan Routing Static Dengan Penerapan IPV4 Dan IPV6 Pada SMPN 9 Kaur. JURNAL MEDIA INFOTAMA, 21(2), 741-747. https://doi.org/10.37676/jmi.v21i2.9309
Section
Articles